Posted by aleks on May 27, 2002 at 23:29:08:
In Reply to: there were no steam chambers either posted by wake up an look the evidence up on May 27, 2002 at 09:01:18:
is your cause really so important as to be so insistant upon the fact that there was no holocaust? it seems rather interesting that you want to stand up and tell everyone what the truth is and how they should faithfully follow it and punish the jews for the evil they had beset upon the earth.
however, the evidence that you give in the assertation that there was no holocaust is just as whatever there was proving that there was a holocaust. in perhaps two decades there will be no such thing as a "holocaust survivor," (and i use the quotes to be non-offensive and proclaim neutrality). what then? will the holocaust cease? or will it continue on as a means of preaching tolerance to humanity?
it is unlikely that if the holocaust was used as cold-war propaganda of some sort (i have no idea where it would come in, though) soon enought it will be said by heads of state or some dissident insider that "oh, that holocaust thing was just some sort of way of causing agitation....&c." if it as the second idea of causing a means of tolerance why should it not exist? don't people work better in that way, or is the cause so moving that people must be enlightened to be peaceful and any current existing method isn't worthy because it is untruthful?
if the cause remains loyal to hitler's ideas, it would be well noted that he wasn't one for the absolute truth either, and as far as "evidence" goes it is overwhelming and from other sources completely unrelated to what the allies would have cared for their "cover-up" of the true cause of the war. hitler fully realized the benefits that can be yielded by the utilization of propaganda.
beside all this, aren't there more important things that can be worried over now instead of revising all history that is just a pile of lies crated by ruling oligarchies? the world is at a terriblephase at the moment, and if because of anything it is because people took zionistic approaches to situations, both current and historical, so that they began a crusade of enlightening the world and spreading their ideas. this is what you are doing and this is what the others are doing. it comes down to the matter of importance on every day events, doesn't it? i do not see what can be yilded by the fight to come to an old state because of the nostalgia of the few. it may be better to look to a future where something can be thought of as having a purpose to what the majority considers as being to the betterment of humanity and civalization. putting to forces against eachother after it has already been done with the loss of human life in almost senseless situations doesn't seem like it is an approach that makes for a better environment. and as far as the world speaks, you may feel free to poll a randomly selected group of people, (better yet the polulation of the world)and see what they prefer, war or peace; destruction or reconstruction; backwardness or progress. it is my assumption that people will take the latter in all instances.